BREAKING NEWS
 

Westcountry families to lose £1,300 a year in child benefit cuts

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, January 08, 2013
Profile image for Western Morning News

Western Morning News

Almost 16,500 families in the Westcountry will lose an average of £1,300 a year under the Government's controversial child benefit overhaul, the Western Morning News can reveal.

From yesterday, households with one earner on more than £50,000 started to lose some or all of the payment as part of a £2 billion Government welfare crackdown.

  1. BUDGET Lead 131477

According to Treasury figures placed in the House of Commons library, 16,440 families in the Westcountry have been sent letters from HM Revenue and Customs telling them they will lose out.

Child benefit is being withdrawn on a sliding scale from families where one earner makes more than £50,000 a year.

FREE Quotations and NO SALESMAN call TODAY

GDH UPVC

View details

Print voucher

With a wealth of experience in all aspects of upvc, from windows & doors to conservatories and anything in between GDH UPVC offers competitive prices why not call today you maybe surprised!

Contact: 01803 226676

Valid until: Thursday, June 20 2013

Households with one earner on £60,000 or more will lose all their benefit – or £1,752 for two children. However, a family with two earners each on £49,000 a year will keep all the money.

Liam Byrne, Labour's Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, told the WMN: "This is another example of parents and working families paying for the Government's failure to get Britain back to work. It is a big con to pretend it's the feckless and the slackers that are being asked to foot the bill."

The Central Devon constituency boasted the largest number of households in Devon affected by the change, with 1,040 families out of pocket. A total of 8,070 households in Devon will be impacted.

In Cornwall, 3,070 families have been hit, and some 880 households in Truro and Falmouth will be affected – the most of all constituencies in the Duchy.

This weekend, Prime Minister David Cameron defended the cuts as "fundamentally fair".

Labour, meanwhile, has launched a new compulsory job scheme for anyone who has been looking for work for more than two years in their bid to appear tough on welfare.

The Opposition claims the scheme would put more than 1,920 people across the Westcountry back into work. Ben Bradshaw, Labour MP for Exeter, said: "The Government needs to take seriously the issue of rising long-term unemployment that has rocketed over the last few years and has caused the Government to borrow more than they planned to pay for benefits."

Today, the Commons will vote on Government plans to cap the annual rises in most working-age benefits at 1% – a real-terms cut – to slash £3.7 billion. Labour is set to oppose the move.

Mr Byrne claimed almost 173,000 people in the Westcountry in work will be hit by the change, arguing it is "strivers" that will be hurt.

He said ministers suggesting the move is an attack on "the slackers" was a "big lie".

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for nickthompson

    by nickthompson

    Wednesday, January 09 2013, 7:57AM

    “As the greedy party sees the way to cut the deficit is to give tax cuts to the super rich,and clobber the most vunerable,the middle class,the working poor, the unemployed,disa­bled etc,here is an idea they might adopt, in fact I wonder IDS hasen't thought of it himself.-------­----A few days ago Fox Hunting was again on the ageda,with very little chance of it ever being re-instated,wel­l, here's my idea,replace the Foxe's with pensioner's,I suggest just ten a meet to start with,when caught by hounds the could be buried on the spot.with 290 packs out 3 days a week,the government could rid themselves of some 8'700 per week'348'000 per 4 week month.
    Everybody's happy,the guys in the red coats get to keep on killing,the government save millions of pounds a year in pension payments, and the Fox lives happy ever after.”

  • Profile image for vockered

    by vockered

    Wednesday, January 09 2013, 1:07AM

    “Why would anybody earning over £60,000 a year think they need benefits anyway?”

  • Profile image for nickthompson

    by nickthompson

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 6:43PM

    “Boris Johnson has appointed his disgraced former deputy mayor as his senior mentoring advisor.

    Ray Lewis, who stood down from his previous role in 2008, will be paid £20,000 a year to work ONE DAY A WEEK.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Just how much longer are we going to put up with this,before we take to the streets?”

  • Profile image for eu_blues

    by eu_blues

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 3:42PM

    “Almost 16,500 families in the Westcountry will lose an average of £1,300 a year under the Government's controversial child benefit overhaul, the Western Morning News can reveal.

    From yesterday, households with one earner on more than £50,000 started to lose some or all of the payment as part of a £2 billion Government welfare crackdown. This is Cornwall

    Just another sign that the benefits system is being systemactically destroyed.

    David Cameron recently stated that he's stopped claiming Child Benefit. Well, of course he would. He's a multi-millionaire after all. Penalising people like this is unacceptable. Those that DON'T represent us in Westminster are all wealthy enough not to depend on benefits. And in most cases are rich because of us. The system dosen't serve the intrest of us.”

  • Profile image for Sconewars

    by Sconewars

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 3:42PM

    “I agree devonguy7. You shouldn't lose it. However, anyone earning above £60,000 per annum should pay a higher rate of income tax. This would be much fairer and easier to collect and administer.”

  • Profile image for JJLee

    by JJLee

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 2:39PM

    “Of course it is unfair but when was being fair an objective of Tory policy?”

  • Profile image for H_Trevorrow

    by H_Trevorrow

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 2:38PM

    “Why such a high threshold. 35K would have been my cut off point.
    The western culture are just at the beginning of the culture shock that emerging nations will inevitably vist on us.
    Any gov that tries taxing wealth and keeping universal benefits will drive the country into a slow growth, dependency addicted, anti entrepreneurial dead end.
    The writing is on the wall except for die hard lefties all benefit will need to be means tested eventually...it was always sold as being a safety net....not a means for high earners to keep thier wine cellar stocked.”

  • Profile image for crgee

    by crgee

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 2:13PM

    “Clearly plenty of ''high earners'' in the west country ...... so not all 'druggies on benefit' then...”

  • Profile image for mikelister66

    by mikelister66

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 12:30PM

    “josdave, I think you'll find it's quite clearly the rich that subsidise the poor, not conversely.

    Time that people realised how much the so called '1%' actually contribute. The top 1% of eaners contribute as much income tax as the bottom 75%. (Around £40 billion for each group with the remaining 24% contributing £80billion).”

  • Profile image for nicold

    by nicold

    Tuesday, January 08 2013, 12:15PM

    “These high earners need to get a life...no one should be under any obligation to pay for you having children, especially receiving an amount most people would dream of earning!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article